The role of Jean-Jacques Rousseau throughout the enlightenment period has made an impact on society today. By changing the perspective of the way we think in how we treat other really opened peoples eyes. The swiss philosopher was able to inspire people to be "noble savages" and practice necessity. Rousseau may not have had much of a big impact on government but he was able to change the way people thought. By doing so, it could have inspired governors to apply Rousseau's thinking into their work. However, Rousseau really did look into the social contract in terms of government. The philosophers throughout did shape government by the spreading of their beliefs & ideas. Rousseau was one of the enlightenment philosophers which contributed to the shaping of government.
Thursday, December 13, 2012
Sunday, December 9, 2012
What do we value at SFS?
This is a picture of the Seoul Foreign Korean Highschool
Korean gate. It has many traditional korean features on the building
and is an important landmark of Seoul Foreign School. This gate shows how much
we value Korea's traditional culture here at SFS. It also shows how we value
worth of it. The construction of the Korean gate took a lot of patience and
long time before it came to what it is today. The art intricately painted on
the gate took clearly shows how much dedication has been put into this gate.
This shows how much Seoul Foreign School values its traditional Korean gate as
well as other elements that are valued.
Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Coin Study
The first thing i noticed when i picked up the coin was that many of them had Queen Elizabeth the 2nd on them. It told me that they really signified their queen. Then i found out it was Australian as it says on the coin. However, i did not need to read that to know. A few of the other coins had imprints of national animals in Australia signifying their wildlife. I inspected beautiful imprints with kangaroos, platypuses, and ostriches. There was also a sign that they valued their heritage and culture as an aboriginal man was on the coin. The last thing i noticed was that they showed the countries seal as well as an outline of its country with a star. Inspecting coins tell us a lot about the country as it portrays it in a unique way.
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Seoul Foreign Boarding School of Montesquieu
Seoul Foreign Boarding School of Montesquieu
- How is order maintained?
- There would be three branches (executive, legislative, judicial) to balance the power. Each group will be able to maintain each other
- Who has power?
- The power is split between executive(Principal), legislative(Teachers and Student Council), and judicial(Vice Principal)
- How did they get that power?
- Whoever is verified to qualify to be in the branch, have an election by students and teachers. The principal should be someone who can overlook the environment, and moderate and initiate social interactions. The vice principal should be someone who is strict in enforcing the rules.
- Where did the rules come from?
- The rules would be suggested by the legislative branch and approved by the principal.
- How are these rules enforced?
- The Vice Principal oversees that the rules are upheld and when rules are broken, he punishes “rulebreakers” accordingly.
- What is the role of students?
- The roles of students would be suggested by the teachers and then approved by the principal. The legislative group will include a number of students enforcing the branch. However, most of the students would be considered as the citizens.
- How would an outsider “know”?
- balance will be maintained, there would be three buildings of equal size and color on equal ground representing the legislative, executive, and judicial branch
- Students would have uniforms to show that nobody has more power than the other
- there would be an equal amount of girls/boys in school and in the classroom
- Each student would receive the same lunch and attend the same classes
- students have identical dorms
- no makeup or jewelry
- all students will have the same haircut
Rousseau Today
Rousseau made a big impact on many peoples lives. He took the soft side as to what man should be whereas many enlightenment philosophers would not look at it that way. Rousseau's ideals & thoughts remind me of the hawaiian culture. Being born in Hawaii i've been influenced to give and be happy with what i have. I think this way of thinking is very important because it makes you a better person and you feel better overall. I also completely agree with Rousseau's beliefs and think we should influence others as we have been doing for many years. :)
Thursday, November 1, 2012
5 distinguishable traits of Jean-Jacques Rousseau
- swiss-born french philosophical writer
- active composer
- noble savage
- educational theory
- pioneer of modern autobiography
Monday, October 22, 2012
Source Analysis
Source Analysis
1. Part of what I like about Flemish Rennaisance painting is that often the artists see the biblical scene in terms of their own every-day life. There are advantages to imagining a scene as it might have occurred at the time described; there are other advantages to translating that ancient story into contemporary terms. In this painting, the tower is built next to a Dutch harbor in classic design. You see that it has superceded the clouds, thus graphically demonstrating in ancient understanding, the reason that God should fear humankind’s intrusion into God’s doman, presenting a threat to ”the gods’ power as described in Genesis 11:1-9. “Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.”
(http://bibleartists.wordpress.com/tag/little-tower-of-babel/)
2. Bruegel's depiction of the architecture of the tower, with its numerous arches and other examples of Roman engineering, is deliberately reminiscent of the Roman Colosseum,[3] which Christians of the time saw as both a symbol of hubris and persecution. Bruegel had visited Rome in 1552-1553. Back in Antwerp, he must have refreshed his memory of Rome with a series of engravings of the principal landmarks of the city made by the publisher of his own prints, Hieronymous Cock, for he incorporated details of Cock's Roman engravings in both surviving versions of the Tower of Babel with few significant alterations.compare 2nd image below The parallel of Rome and Babylon had a particular significance for Bruegel's contemporaries: Rome was the Eternal City, intended by the Caesars to last for ever, and its decay and ruin were taken to symbolize the vanity and transience of earthly efforts.[2] The Tower was also symbolic of the turmoil between the Catholic church (which at the time did services only in Latin) and the polyglot Lutheran Protestant religion of the Netherlands.[4] Although at first glance the tower appears to be a stable series of concentric pillars, upon closer examination it is apparent that none of the layers lie at a true horizontal. Rather the tower is built as an ascending spiral.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tower_of_Babel_(Bruegel)
3. These were followed
by two masterpieces of 1563, the Flight into Egypt (U. London,
Courtauld Inst. Gals), which is a landscape like the Suicide of Saul,
and the Tower of Babel (Vienna, Ksthist. Mus.), the undated variant
of which (Rotterdam, Mus. Boymans–van Beuningen) is usually
thought to have been painted c. 1567–8. The theme of the Tower of
Babel does not occur on panel before Bruegel, except for a lost work
by Patinir that is said to have been in Cardinal Grimani’s palace in
Venice. Bruegel’s eerie architectural Utopia is modelled on the ruins of the Colosseum in Rome,
which he must have studied while in Italy. He conceived the vision of a Roman monstrosity, thePieter Bruegel I: Road to
Calvary, oil on panel, 1.23×1.7…
Pieter Bruegel I: Hunters in the
Snow, oil on panel,…
Pieter Bruegel I: Return of the
Herd, oil on panel,…
fearful scale of which far exceeded all architectural megalomanias of the past. The Tower of
Babylon, described in the Bible and by Josephus Flavius, symbolizes the fact that all the works of
mankind are doomed to imperfection. According to Demus, the tower could not be completed
because the hubristic design of its builders had reached the limits of possibility. Bruegel’s intent is
to make evident this frustration: the scene typifies ‘a glaring want of coordination’, ‘a muddled
conception doomed from the outset’, ‘an absurd state of helplessness before the grandiose
mockery of a nightmarish bankruptcy of reason’.
http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/~bevans/pieter%20brugel%20grove%20bio.pdf
1. Part of what I like about Flemish Rennaisance painting is that often the artists see the biblical scene in terms of their own every-day life. There are advantages to imagining a scene as it might have occurred at the time described; there are other advantages to translating that ancient story into contemporary terms. In this painting, the tower is built next to a Dutch harbor in classic design. You see that it has superceded the clouds, thus graphically demonstrating in ancient understanding, the reason that God should fear humankind’s intrusion into God’s doman, presenting a threat to ”the gods’ power as described in Genesis 11:1-9. “Come, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.”
(http://bibleartists.wordpress.com/tag/little-tower-of-babel/)
2. Bruegel's depiction of the architecture of the tower, with its numerous arches and other examples of Roman engineering, is deliberately reminiscent of the Roman Colosseum,[3] which Christians of the time saw as both a symbol of hubris and persecution. Bruegel had visited Rome in 1552-1553. Back in Antwerp, he must have refreshed his memory of Rome with a series of engravings of the principal landmarks of the city made by the publisher of his own prints, Hieronymous Cock, for he incorporated details of Cock's Roman engravings in both surviving versions of the Tower of Babel with few significant alterations.compare 2nd image below The parallel of Rome and Babylon had a particular significance for Bruegel's contemporaries: Rome was the Eternal City, intended by the Caesars to last for ever, and its decay and ruin were taken to symbolize the vanity and transience of earthly efforts.[2] The Tower was also symbolic of the turmoil between the Catholic church (which at the time did services only in Latin) and the polyglot Lutheran Protestant religion of the Netherlands.[4] Although at first glance the tower appears to be a stable series of concentric pillars, upon closer examination it is apparent that none of the layers lie at a true horizontal. Rather the tower is built as an ascending spiral.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tower_of_Babel_(Bruegel)
3. These were followed
by two masterpieces of 1563, the Flight into Egypt (U. London,
Courtauld Inst. Gals), which is a landscape like the Suicide of Saul,
and the Tower of Babel (Vienna, Ksthist. Mus.), the undated variant
of which (Rotterdam, Mus. Boymans–van Beuningen) is usually
thought to have been painted c. 1567–8. The theme of the Tower of
Babel does not occur on panel before Bruegel, except for a lost work
by Patinir that is said to have been in Cardinal Grimani’s palace in
Venice. Bruegel’s eerie architectural Utopia is modelled on the ruins of the Colosseum in Rome,
which he must have studied while in Italy. He conceived the vision of a Roman monstrosity, thePieter Bruegel I: Road to
Calvary, oil on panel, 1.23×1.7…
Pieter Bruegel I: Hunters in the
Snow, oil on panel,…
Pieter Bruegel I: Return of the
Herd, oil on panel,…
fearful scale of which far exceeded all architectural megalomanias of the past. The Tower of
Babylon, described in the Bible and by Josephus Flavius, symbolizes the fact that all the works of
mankind are doomed to imperfection. According to Demus, the tower could not be completed
because the hubristic design of its builders had reached the limits of possibility. Bruegel’s intent is
to make evident this frustration: the scene typifies ‘a glaring want of coordination’, ‘a muddled
conception doomed from the outset’, ‘an absurd state of helplessness before the grandiose
mockery of a nightmarish bankruptcy of reason’.
http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/~bevans/pieter%20brugel%20grove%20bio.pdf
Notable Individual Reflection
Pieter Bruegel
Pieter Bruegel was an interesting artist to study and i am glad i chose him. Most people just went for Leonardo Da Vinci or any other common names but when i saw Pieter Bruegel at the bottom of the list, i thought who's that? And so i picked up a book about him in the library and i liked his works. Pieter Bruegel is a unique artist. One thing i really admire about him was of how he never got the recognition he gets today. Even if he wasn't recognized his whole life as a great artist, he kept on working and pursuing art. For me, I thought that was one of the things that gave me so much respect for him.
For his art, there was something special about it. Pieter Bruegel did not have the best life and that was something i liked as it showed onto his art. His art portrayed deep, meaningful topics. This was actually his strength, because if he were to have the best life his art would probably not have as much meaning put into them. One of the things i remember most about Bruegel were his grisailles. His grisaille's had so much meaning in them and it was fun to figure out what everything meant in the grisaille. Rather than just using elements of art, grisailles had dark toned colors so everything revolved around the symbols of the drawing. I also remember that I read about how Bruegel would draw sketches of peasants. I thought this was important because most people at his time would have probably not liked this. Bruegel had very personal works of art as i remember he kept one of his grisailles until he died. Another thing that intrigued me about him was that there was little information known about him. This brings me back to my last point as I mentioned how he was barely recognized at the time. Because little was known about him, it makes me more interested as to what he could have gone though and gives off a mysterious kind of vibe. I like to explore so I'm really glad i chose Pieter Bruegel for my notable individual.
Pieter Bruegel was an interesting artist to study and i am glad i chose him. Most people just went for Leonardo Da Vinci or any other common names but when i saw Pieter Bruegel at the bottom of the list, i thought who's that? And so i picked up a book about him in the library and i liked his works. Pieter Bruegel is a unique artist. One thing i really admire about him was of how he never got the recognition he gets today. Even if he wasn't recognized his whole life as a great artist, he kept on working and pursuing art. For me, I thought that was one of the things that gave me so much respect for him.
For his art, there was something special about it. Pieter Bruegel did not have the best life and that was something i liked as it showed onto his art. His art portrayed deep, meaningful topics. This was actually his strength, because if he were to have the best life his art would probably not have as much meaning put into them. One of the things i remember most about Bruegel were his grisailles. His grisaille's had so much meaning in them and it was fun to figure out what everything meant in the grisaille. Rather than just using elements of art, grisailles had dark toned colors so everything revolved around the symbols of the drawing. I also remember that I read about how Bruegel would draw sketches of peasants. I thought this was important because most people at his time would have probably not liked this. Bruegel had very personal works of art as i remember he kept one of his grisailles until he died. Another thing that intrigued me about him was that there was little information known about him. This brings me back to my last point as I mentioned how he was barely recognized at the time. Because little was known about him, it makes me more interested as to what he could have gone though and gives off a mysterious kind of vibe. I like to explore so I'm really glad i chose Pieter Bruegel for my notable individual.
WORKS CITED
Bruegel, Pieter. The Little Tower of Babel. 1564. Panel. Museum Boymans-van
Beuningen, Rotterdam.
Beuningen, Rotterdam.
Bruegel, Pieter. The Tower of Babel. 1563. Panel. Kunstbistorisches Museum, Vienna.
"Little Tower of Babel." The Bible Through Artists' Eyes. wordpress, 22 Jan.
2011. Web. 15 Sept. 2012. <http://bibleartists.wordpress.com/tag/
little-tower-of-babel/>.
2011. Web. 15 Sept. 2012. <http://bibleartists.wordpress.com/tag/
little-tower-of-babel/>.
Sara's World History Blog. Blogger, n.d. Web. 22 Oct. 2012.
<http://sarasworldhistoryblog.blogspot.kr/>.
<http://sarasworldhistoryblog.blogspot.kr/>.
Stechow, Wolfgang. Pieter Bruegel the Elder. New York: Abrams, 1990. Print.
"The Tower of Babel (Bruegel)." Wikipedia. Wikipedia, 10 Sept. 2012. Web. 15
Sept. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
The_Tower_of_Babel_(Bruegel)>.
Sept. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
The_Tower_of_Babel_(Bruegel)>.
Wied, Alexander. "Bruegel: (1) Pieter Bruegel I." Oxford Art Online. Oxford UP,
n.d. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/~bevans/
pieter%20brugel%20grove%20bio.pdf>.
n.d. Web. 14 Oct. 2012. <http://www.montgomerycollege.edu/~bevans/
pieter%20brugel%20grove%20bio.pdf>.
Monday, October 15, 2012
The Tower of Babel
My primary source for my notable individual is a painting called "the Tower of Babel" by Pieter Bruegel. The reason why i chose this painting by Bruegel is because i thought landscape paintings were one of his strongest points and this painting also includes architecture. Bruegel did have many deep, meaningful grisailles but i wanted to do something more fun and colorful.
The Tower of Babel consists of three different paintings but all of the tower. In the first picture on the right, you see "The Tower of Babel" this was Bruegel's first painting of the three. The Tower of Babel was said by the Bible (Book of Genesis) to be a tower built to unify people. "Then they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.'" (Genesis 11:4)
This shows its value to the religious aspect of the painting. Also, if you look closely on the bottom left-hand corner you will notice something going on. I do not know for sure but it looks to me as if peasants are bowing down to wealthy patrons. This is a very renaissance element shown in the painting.
Bruegel also did two other paintings of the Tower of Babel. However the one shown on the right was named as "The Little Tower of Babel". The Little Tower of Bruegel shows the tower except more developed. It also has different landscape pictures and does not include people. The Tower of Babel's architecture has many roman based elements. (columns, arches, etc.)
My primary source for my notable individual is a painting called "the Tower of Babel" by Pieter Bruegel. The reason why i chose this painting by Bruegel is because i thought landscape paintings were one of his strongest points and this painting also includes architecture. Bruegel did have many deep, meaningful grisailles but i wanted to do something more fun and colorful.
The Tower of Babel consists of three different paintings but all of the tower. In the first picture on the right, you see "The Tower of Babel" this was Bruegel's first painting of the three. The Tower of Babel was said by the Bible (Book of Genesis) to be a tower built to unify people. "Then they said, 'Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower with its top in the heavens, and let us make a name for ourselves; otherwise we shall be scattered abroad upon the face of the whole earth.'" (Genesis 11:4)
The Little Tower of Babel |
Bruegel also did two other paintings of the Tower of Babel. However the one shown on the right was named as "The Little Tower of Babel". The Little Tower of Bruegel shows the tower except more developed. It also has different landscape pictures and does not include people. The Tower of Babel's architecture has many roman based elements. (columns, arches, etc.)
Thursday, October 11, 2012
Why i like history?
Welcome! :D
I like history because it's fun to know the origins to everything! I find it very
interesting of how things came to be. Its so weird but interesting to look back
at history and wonder how it came to be our world today. Everything in history
is so important, the people, timing, place, power, etc. Seeing how all those
elements meshed together is what really fascinates me. One of my favorite
things about history is the folklore of different cultures. For an example, my favorite
is the Greek gods. Learning about the stories they created are just really fun
to know about. History is also very important because it’s the inspiration for
countless creations today. So many successful tv shows, movies, and books all come from inspirations from the past! Sometimes I wish I were able to time travel, to see how my life could turn out in certain time periods & experience all the different cultures that cannot be reached anymore. I wish to keep expanding my knowledge about history
& learn a lot! :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)